Help us improve by providing feedback or contacting help@jisc.ac.uk
Research Problem
Rationale / Hypothesis
Method
Results
Analysis
Interpretation
Real World Application

Results of interviews with research infrastructure managers on their perceptions of Octopus

Publication type:Results
Published:
Language:English
Licence:
CC BY 4.0
Peer Reviews (This Version): (0)
Red flags:

(0)

Actions
Download:
Sign in for more actions
Sections

The recruitment of interviewees began in June 2023, which coincided with the beginning of academic breaks in many European and North American research institutions. This timing made recruitment difficult, as the individuals we contacted often did not reply or were unavailable.

Interviews with five participants representing three institutions took place between July and September 2023 (Table 1), four of whom were women. Three participants were based at the University of Bristol as we were most successful in eliciting responses from within our university.

Table 1. Research infrastructure managers interviewed and their roles.

Role

Institution

Job

Librarian

Research university

Promote data publishing and the use of research metrics, mainly with social sciences and health researchers.

Librarian

Research university

Manage institutional data repository and advise researchers on data management.

Researcher development officer

Research university

Facilitate academic staff development for all faculties - from arts to the sciences.

Open science lead

Non-profit medical research funding body

Develop and promote open science practices within the organisation and the research it funds.

Librarian 

National research policy agency (former); PhD student at research university (current)

Develop national-level research policy and infrastructure for a Southeast Asian country.

Transcripts with personally-identifying information redacted are not currently published.

We thank the five interviewees for giving their valuable time, all of who were willing to be acknowledged here (in alphabetical order of first name): Chris Erdmann, Kirsty Merrett, Lydia Klimecki, Madiareni Sulaiman, Zosia Beckles.

Ethical statement

The results in this publication involved human or animal subjects.

The interviews were conducted with ethical approval from the University of Bristol School of Psychological Science Research Ethics Committee with reference number 12335.

Data permissions statement

The results in this publication does not involve access to materials owned or copyrighted materials (except those in the private ownership of the authors).

Data access statement

Transcripts with personally-identifying information redacted are not currently published.

Funders

This Results has the following sources of funding:

Conflict of interest

This Results does not have any specified conflicts of interest.